INTELSONLINE came with a ready request for a neural network:
We have finalized it and expanded the capabilities of the service
The client had a non-working, "raw" algorithm
improvement
support
01
02
Development process
03/
Patent experts:
The process took
selected 100 trademarks and selected 50 similar ones for each.
Our development team:
We trained the nerual network using this dataset. Initially the neural network made decisions based on examples rather than a similiraity criteria
4
months
Result:
a neural network trained on 5 thousand characters connects to the database of existing trademarks - there are 1.5 million of them. The system checks the user's logo for similarity to them.
System operation diagram
04/
User uploads a logo image:
The neural network compares it with trademarks registered in the CIS countries, the Baltic States, as well as the Database of the World Intellectual Property Organization
Our system produces a list of trademarks with a visually similar logo - potential plagiarism:
The list is ranked - the most similar trademarks are shown first. This saves the experts' time.
Project team
05/
Computer Vision Engineer
MLOps engineer
Project manager
Data scientist
BackEnd developer
Difficulties of the project
06/
In data science, there is always a risk that nothing will work out, simply because the right tools have not yet appeared. It usually takes a long time to find them.
But in this case everything went according to plan. We corrected developer errors and used a succesful algorithim that gave us 80% accuracy.
Were poorley timed
What did we accomplish
07/
01
achieve 80 percent accuracy
show the most relevant images in the first hundred of results
save the customers time by removing the need for patent attorney work